Re: XPointer goes to REC
From: "Rich Salz" <rsalz@d...> > > This further says that W3C is politically motivated and is not a true > > standards body but one where commercial interests of the insiders are put > > ahead of the standards process - > > Do you know of any standards organization where this isn't true? This is an overstatement. In W3C, for example, the intensely commercial working groups such as XML Schema and XQuery are still commented on by intensely non-commercial (in the narrow sense) groups such as Internationalization and Web Accessibility. And vice versa. In ISO, it is group-by-group: the SC34 group has long been dominated by users rather than vendors, and the 1 nation = 1 vote system that ISO uses reduces the feasibility of committee stacking. At OASIS, a group like the RELAX NG group is hardly dominated by commercial interests: I think all the implementations of RELAX NG are either Open Source or freeware binaries Cheers Rick Jelliffe P.S.Is it too long a bow to draw to say that the relationship between companies and standards bodies is sometimes like nations and treaty organizations? For US substitute MS.
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format