RE: XML into SQL and out again
> I guess my main concern at the moment is whether to use attribute or > element based tagging here...i still don't know what the exact > implications of my choice will be...what I need is a bunch of I'm not sure if attribute vs. element will make much difference here. Both are fairly easy to map to relational. If you want to make it so that you do not even need to maintain a mapping, you can use the default mapping (which is use attribute names for column names and element names for table names). You could also shop around for a standard address-book schema and use that. DSML is one common scheme -- if you go through the extra work to make Quark and SQL Server deal with DSML, then both will also work with any other DSML-aware product. It's extra work, though, so only if you care :-)
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format