Re: Boringness (was Re: Flame bait du jour)
Mike Champion <mc@x...> writes: > On Mon, 3 Mar 2003 15:46:17 -0800, Dare Obasanjo <dareo@m...> > wrote: > > > > > > Forwarded "XML [expletive deleted]" articles aren't really worth discussing. > > FWIW, I thought it was a different twist on "XML [expletive deleted]." If he thinks > it [expletive deleted] because it's boring, I think he's wrong -- the power of XML > comes from the fact that the most useful parts are utterly boring. > The parts that I think [expletive deleted] are the "interesting" parts. > > But I guess it's meta-boring to talk about what is boring :-) Mike, the article has a point, and it's staggering: even though $BIG_CO says XML is the solution to all problems, it is as likely to be one as all the other things $BIG_CO said were going to. As far as boring goes? I know people who claim character encodings are boring (they are all Latin1 speakers). What is boring and what is exciting is highly personal, and varies (both ways) with how much exposure one has had to the subject. So you disagree with one Guy Kewney on what's boring. Is that exciting? And why is he "gagged by a non-disclosure agreement for a couple of weeks, or so" to say what everyone on this list has known for months? I must say though, that after reading the para you quoted, I had to go read the entire thing just to see if the rest of it was as much a random mix of keywords. I almost thought it was generated by one of those trigram toys. Ari.
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format