|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Whitepapers and ScreenShots of Office 11 XML Featur es
> On the contrary. View Source is essential. Read DTD is nice-to-have. > And for something reasonably complex, like for example DocBook or HTML, > in my experience it's *easier* to learn by View Source. Anyhow, I'd > rather have a program read the DTD for me and tell me where I got the > instance wrong. Reading moderately-complex DTDs with lots of parameter > entities can be immensely difficult. -Tim Had DTDs been better documented and more readable they'd have doubtless gotten more use. The same could be said of XML schema work. Users tend to take the path of least resistance. Often cobbling up HTML that gets something working in a browser is usually where they stop. I find the whole readability argument to be a bit of a red herring. It's ALL unreadable unless you know what's going on. Sometimes, as Tim points out, it can be immensely difficult to understand. Combine that with the situation that has browers and other tools not able to /properly/ handle or utilize the extra-HTML data and you've got the situation we have today. It seems like an awful lot of complaining about the readability of things should be better placed on the crappy condition of the tools and documentation. -Bill Kearney
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








