[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Namespace URI question

• To: 'Bill Kearney ' <wkearney99@h...>, "'xml-dev@l... '" <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: Namespace URI question
• From: Jeff Lowery <jlowery@s...>
• Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2002 13:10:49 -0800
• List-help: <mailto:xml-dev-help@l...>
• List-subscribe: <mailto:xml-dev-subscribe@l...>
• List-unsubscribe: <mailto:xml-dev-unsubscribe@l...>

> Err, that's not consistent from browser to browser.  

Well, maybe I'm not actually _on_ the clue train, but with luck somewhere
near the ticket counter.

> Also, the namespace URI isn't required to
> reference a
> resolvable document, it's just an identifier.  You're suggesting that
> the URI
> here is resolvable to the actual XML schema document.  

No. What I meant to suggest was that the deprecation of relative URI
_strings_ for namespace identifiers might, for similar reasons, be
considered to encompass absolute URIs with localhost at the base. But I now
admit that I'm none too familiar with the arguments leading up to the
deprecation of relative namespace URI strings, so it is fair to say that it
was a wild ass speculation on my part. 

And now look: the Namespace URI permathread has started up again. 

Maybe I'll take a boat.

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Namespace URI question
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: Enumerated Lists Derived from Enumerated List simpleType - Reality Check
• Next by Date: RE: Namespace URI question
• Previous by thread: Re: Enumerated Lists Derived from Enumerated List simpleType - Reality Check
• Next by thread: RE: Namespace URI question
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread