|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: bohemians, gentry
"Simon St.Laurent" wrote: > Uche Ogbuji has a thoughtful (and thought-provoking) piece at: > http://www.adtmag.com/article.asp?id=6965 AOL to this, Uche. I would actually go beyond your point: "Certainly, if you want your data to outlast your code, and to be more portable to unforeseen, future uses, you would do well to lower your own level of class consciousness. Strong data typing in XML tends to pigeonhole data to specific tools, environments and situations. This often raises the total cost of managing that data." It is not just over time, but right now, between utterly dissimilar systems whose only nexus is the internetwork, that communication is possible only by instantiating a common syntax into locally idiosyncratic semantics at each end of the conversation. This is not the first example of the bohemians perfecting as art the very tools which the science of the gentry lacked, but would require to achieve ubiquity. In astronomy, engineering, and chemistry of the Renaissance key pieces are supplied by alchemists, painters, dyers or poisoners. Consider e.g. Palladio's sketches of ancient Roman construction, instantiated so differently (and in the instantiation demanding entirely new mechanical invention) in the local understandings of Rome, London and Washington, DC. What, if anything, would have been built had he produced engineering field office quality blueprints?
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








