[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: xml-dev@lists.xml.org

• To: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Subject: RE: xml-dev@l...
• From: Ian Graham <igraham@i...>
• Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 19:02:31 -0500 (EST)
• Cc: "'Paul Prescod'" <paul@p...>, xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EEEACD6C@h...>
• Reply-to: Ian Graham <ian.graham@u...>

I can' decide if that is good or bad.  But either way it
sends a shiver down my back -- :-/

Ian
On Fri, 13 Dec 2002, Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:

> Nah.  Broad acceptance is when a 
> woman you meet at the conference 
> asks you to meet at the hotel bar 
> for a drink to talk about namespaces 
> and why they are evil.
> 
> len
> 
> From: Paul Prescod [mailto:paul@p...]
> 
> I'm at a conference where I'm listening to Oracle talk about the XML 
> support in their database after last night I heard how Word has XML 
> built in. People are here from health care to legal to military to 
> entertainment. Most programmers working on interesting new applications 
> use XML for some bit of it, if only their build system or configuration 
> file. And there is no sign of growth slowing or stopping.
> 
> That's broad acceptance.

• References:
  • RE: xml-dev@l...
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Namespace URI question
• Next by Date: Re: Namespace URI question
• Previous by thread: RE: xml-dev@l...
• Next by thread: Potentially interesting job at G8's Open Knowledge Network
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread