[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: bohemians, gentry

• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: bohemians, gentry
• From: Norman Walsh <ndw@n...>
• Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2002 09:39:11 -0500
• In-reply-to: <3DEEF633.2080101@p...> (Paul Prescod's message of "Wed,04 Dec 2002 22:46:11 -0800")
• References: <B885BEDCB3664E4AB1C72F1D85CB29F804B54987@R...><3DEEF633.2080101@p...>
• User-agent: Gnus/5.090008 (Oort Gnus v0.08) Emacs/21.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

/ Paul Prescod <paul@p...> was heard to say:
| Is there a conformance level of either XQuery or XPath that allows one
| to avoid the implementation of XML Schema datatypes altogether?

I think that's still the subject of discussion within the WGs.

There would clearly be some "ease-of-implementation" value in
providing such a level. (And it would probably satisfy the folks who
want XSLT 2.0 with XPath 1.0.)

But would it be different, in practice, from using a datatype-capable
processor to process well-formed XML with no schema using a stylesheet
that didn't use any type constructs?

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

- -- 
Norman.Walsh@S...    | A child becomes an adult when he realizes he
XML Standards Architect | has a right not only to be right but also to
Web Tech. and Standards | be wrong.--Thomas Szasz
Sun Microsystems, Inc.  | 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.7 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>

iD8DBQE972UPOyltUcwYWjsRAqptAJ9JqK2Qp9vagaI8Hp9Q9Opb/owJdQCgrSu1
fdUZ2JgW15uq45yG5zxb40c=
=YvoK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: bohemians, gentry
    • From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
  • RE: bohemians, gentry
    • From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@n...>

• References:
  • RE: bohemians, gentry
    • From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
  • Re: bohemians, gentry
    • From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>

• Prev by Date: Re: bohemians, gentry
• Next by Date: Re: bohemians, gentry
• Previous by thread: Re: bohemians, gentry
• Next by thread: RE: bohemians, gentry
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread