|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] contractual madmess (was Re: The privilege of XML)
costello@m... (Roger L. Costello) writes: >Isn't a data model a contract between the sender and the receiver? If >we have agreed to this contract then we can effectively communicate, >right? /Roger I'm really starting to wonder if this data-model-as-contract business wasn't overblown from the start, though I'll confess that it's taken me a while to figure that out. It's not like we agreed to any particular contract stating that you would interpret this message a particular way, according to the XYZ rules of the English language, right? It's not like it took a signed contract for me to turn a fax with a credit card number into an order for a book from an individual when I worked in sales, either. Strict data models have long been a means of coercing dumb computers into "understanding" information in the way humans would like them too. Maybe it's time, now that computers have come a long ways in processing power, short-term and long-term memory, to start thinking about models for processing information that allow computers at least the interpretive leeway I had once upon a time when I was a Sales Assistant. They're probably at least as capable as I was. -- Simon St.Laurent Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets Errors, errors, all fall down! http://simonstl.com -- http://monasticxml.org
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








