[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Typing and paranoia

• To: XML Dev <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: Typing and paranoia
• From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>
• Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2002 15:48:19 -0500
• References: <3DEF8BFF.4030100@t...> <oprgx03bryezizxn@localhost><p04330102ba155c1a0b9f@[192.168.254.4]>

[Elliotte Rusty Harold]
> At 12:48 PM -0500 12/5/02, Mike Champion wrote:
> 
> 
> >You don't REALLY want two processes on the same machine to pass 
> >around angle bracketed Unicode text rather than DOMs or
> >SAX event streams do you?  Or do you just object to calling
> >it "XML"?
> 
> Actually, I do really do want to do that. Within the same process I'm 
> content to pass objects, but between different processes, they're  a 
> number of advantages to passing real XML. Among them, in ascending 
> order of significance:
> 
> 1. It makes it a lot easier if I decide to split the processes 
> between machines.
> 

I have done the same, and for much the same reasons.

Cheers,

Tom P

• References:
  • Typing and paranoia
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
  • Re: Typing and paranoia
    • From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
  • Re: Typing and paranoia
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Typing and paranoia
• Next by Date: Re: Typing and paranoia
• Previous by thread: Re: Typing and paranoia
• Next by thread: Re: Typing and paranoia
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread