[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: The RDDL challenge

• To: XML Dev <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: The RDDL challenge
• From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>
• Date: 25 Nov 2002 17:32:55 +0100
• In-reply-to: <3DDFC60B.9030702@t...>
• References: <3DDFC60B.9030702@t...>

Hi Tim,

On Sat, 2002-11-23 at 19:16, Tim Bray wrote:
> Those who are interested in issues around RDDL and directories and 
> namespaces might want to check out
> 
>   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2002Nov/0147.html
> 
> Postings on the subject in this forum are not apt to be useful, please 
> take it to www-tag. -Tim

I thought RDDL was, like SAX, a xml-dev specification, isn't it the case
any longer?

Eric
-- 
Did you know it? Python has now a Relax NG (partial) implementation.
                                          http://advogato.org/proj/xvif/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric van der Vlist       http://xmlfr.org            http://dyomedea.com
(W3C) XML Schema ISBN:0-596-00252-1 http://oreilly.com/catalog/xmlschema
------------------------------------------------------------------------

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: The RDDL challenge
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>

• References:
  • The RDDL challenge
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>

• Prev by Date: Re: SAX startDocument and endDocument when there's onlya document fragment
• Next by Date: Re: XML, Rich Internet Apps
• Previous by thread: The RDDL challenge
• Next by thread: Re: The RDDL challenge
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread