[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: RDDL/RDF - no RDF tax?

• To: "Jonathan Borden" <jonathan@o...>, <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: RDDL/RDF - no RDF tax?
• From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
• Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 09:25:54 -0500
• In-reply-to: <00c801c28e52$7a011930$7c674544@n...>
• References: <00c801c28e52$7a011930$7c674544@n...>

I notice the RDDL 2 spec has two RDF options, one somewhat readable, 
one less so. Are you asking us to pick one? Or are these just two 
options that are permitted by the RDF spec, both of which are legal 
and mean the same thing?
-- 

+-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+
| Elliotte Rusty Harold | elharo@m... | Writer/Programmer |
+-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+
|          XML in a  Nutshell, 2nd Edition (O'Reilly, 2002)          |
|              http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/xian2/              |
|  http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN%3D0596002920/cafeaulaitA/  |
+----------------------------------+---------------------------------+
|  Read Cafe au Lait for Java News:  http://www.cafeaulait.org/      |
|  Read Cafe con Leche for XML News: http://www.cafeconleche.org/    |
+----------------------------------+---------------------------------+

• References:
  • RDDL/RDF - no RDF tax?
    • From: "Jonathan Borden" <jonathan@o...>

• Prev by Date: Re: RDF and the new releases
• Next by Date: SAX startDocument and endDocument when there's only a documentfragment
• Previous by thread: Re: RDDL/RDF - no RDF tax?
• Next by thread: Why RDF is hard
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread