[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: more QName madness

• To: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Subject: RE: more QName madness
• From: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>
• Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 20:53:57 -0500 (EST)
• Cc: "xml-dev@l..." <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <r01050400-1021-16D0AADBF83611D681070003937A08C2@[192.168.124.21]>

Me?  I'm not trying to throw out anything.  I'm trying to understand what
the throwers (e.g., Michael Kay) prefer.  I agree that a QNAME datatype
is a mistake, because it's useless without context.
	/r$

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: more QName madness
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• References:
  • RE: more QName madness
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: RE: more QName madness
• Next by Date: RE: more QName madness
• Previous by thread: RE: more QName madness
• Next by thread: RE: more QName madness
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread