[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: RDF and the new releases

• To: <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: RDF and the new releases
• From: "Ken North" <ken_north@c...>
• Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 22:52:02 -0800
• References: <AOEKLHGMHIHGNIBEDMNMGEGODEAA.shelleyp@b...>
• Sender: ken_north@c...

Shelley Powers wrote:
> What puzzles and confuses me ...

Good commentary and the kudos for the WG are a nice touch.

 > "Sorry, I just don't see much interest in RDF."

RDF is not unique in this respect. Perhaps because of today's economic climate,
the pace of innovation and new technology adoption has slowed from gallop to
trot to walk.

As for RDF being unreadable or incomprehensible, Jonathan Borden's always said
you can do a presentation about RDF using one slide.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: RDF and the new releases
    • From: Matt Gushee <mgushee@h...>

• References:
  • RDF and the new releases
    • From: "Shelley Powers" <shelleyp@b...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Malicious XML
• Next by Date: RE: Changing XForms 1.0 Semantics in XPath 1.0?
• Previous by thread: RDF and the new releases
• Next by thread: Re: RDF and the new releases
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread