|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: XML/RDF
Mike Champion wrote: >... > > I'm not hostile to RDF (for localized domains in which effective > taxonomies exist, anyway, don't get me started about the "Semantic Web"), What do you think the Semantic Web is? To me, it is just the union of the localized domains with links between them where possible. If there is value in the localized domains, why would the integration of them into a Web of links be problematic? > just skeptical that it's worth a significant investment of my time. > Does anyone want to try to persuade us skeptics that RDF's time > has come? Although I'm no fan of RDF's XML syntax, I would say that one of the major benefits of RDF (beyond the tools, of course) is that with OWL (or DAML) RDF is much more naturally extensible and integratable than plain old XML. For instance if you have a property called isSon, I can say that implies my isChild property and its inverse isParent. I can also say that your isSon proprty implies my isMale property. Those are important forms of extensibility. Of course it is easy to make those kinds of assertions in Java or Python code but only using SemWeb technologies can I publish those assertions in a standardized manner so that someone else can build upon them. For instance, if a third party knows about my isMale property and they see my assertion about its relationship to your isSon property then they now know something important about isSon. Paul Prescod
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








