Cart
|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: XML/RDF
 jcowan@r... (John Cowan) writes: >Simon St.Laurent scripsit: > >> "Eschew mixed content" seemed the most ridiculous (and memorable) at >> the time, and I'd been having particular annoyances with general >> failures to appreciate mixed content at that point. (Both W3C XML >> Schema and RELAX NG seem to treat it as a special case rather than >> as something quite normal, though RELAX NG is less extreme in that.) > >RNG treats text as a special case? In what sense? RNG treats mixed content as a special case, with extra restrictions. We've been over this recently: http://aspn.activestate.com/ASPN/Mail/Message/1375367 http://aspn.activestate.com/ASPN/Mail/Message/1375385 http://aspn.activestate.com/ASPN/Mail/Message/1375600 It's not nearly as strange as W3C XML Schema, admittedly. >> Looking at the whole project in more detail and with examples, I >> find the whole thing repulsive, at least when taken as an approach >> to creating XML generally. On the other hand, as a human-readable >> syntax for RDF, it's far better than anything else I've seen. > >It's always been acceptable RDF. What's been acceptable RDF? Given that you created that set of restrictions with RDF in mind, I'd be surprised if they didn't produce acceptable RDF. What I said was that your flavor of XML is the least-painful version of RDF I've yet seen. That in itself is an achievement. ------------- Simon St.Laurent - SSL is my TLA http://simonstl.com may be my URI http://monasticxml.org may be my ascetic URI urn:oid:1.3.6.1.4.1.6320 is another possibility altogether 
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! 
Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||
