Re: RDF : Headless Triples syntax
Danny Ayers scripsit: > I can understand the need for an <rdf:RDF> wall around embedded RDF in the > current syntax (to keep its Gothic structure out of sight). If however the > RDF was restricted to (decapitated) one-layer statements, I reckon an > <rdf:D> ha-ha is adequate. Actually, rdf:RDF isn't required, and Reuters Health doesn't use it. -- John Cowan <jcowan@r...> http://www.reutershealth.com http://www.ccil.org/~cowan .e'osai ko sarji la lojban. Please support Lojban! http://www.lojban.org
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format