Re: more QName madness
W. E. Perry scripsit: > This is *precisely* my point as to why QNames (i.e. in document content) are > otiose. Otiose, perhaps, but not odious. I do not understand the URIs Good, QNames Bad point of view, since they are plainly isomorphic. Indeed, RDF defines a two-way mapping between QNames and (some) URIs. It would be more consistent for you to attack URIs, QNames, and IP addresses, all of which are universal agreements creating global names, in favor of some UUCP-like scheme where the node that calls itself "deutsch" is known to its various neighbors as "german", "duits", "tedesco", "allemagne", etc. etc. -- John Cowan <jcowan@r...> http://www.reutershealth.com http://www.ccil.org/~cowan .e'osai ko sarji la lojban. Please support Lojban! http://www.lojban.org
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format