|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: equivalentTo vs. XSLT
Miles Sabin wrote: >Nikita Ogievetsky wrote, > >>engine can be implemented in any language. >>As I understand it correctly, all you are saying is that OWL can at >>least partially be implemented in XSL >> > >Not quite. I'm saying that vocabulary to vocabulary mappings can be >expressed in XSLT as well as in OWL, and I'm suggesting that for many >practical purposes XSLT is likely to be a better bet. > Sorry, I have to dissagree. I cannot imagine even a single case where that is true. A transformation can only be applied to a "screenshot" of the source data. Also, such an attempt may result in loss of semantic info. A transformation may result in a correct mapping between ontologies, but will fail in producing implicit statements that would result from those mappings after applied with equivalentTo. Cheers, Manos
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








