|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: What are the arguments *for* XHTML 2.0?
Elliotte Rusty Harold wrote: > I don't see any information about how the respondents were selected. > Since it was done as an online study, it's entirely possible that there > was some selection affect that skewed the sample population. And without casting aspersions, given the amount of FUD I've seen come from MM in the past two years I would hardly be surprised. > I also note, that if you actually look at the numbers, only 53% of the > survey respondents in the U.S. had Flash 6. Numbers were slightly higher > elsewhere up to 61.3% in Europe. You can get 92% going back only to > Flash 5. You only achieve the 97.8% number by including everything back > to Flash 2. Can Flash 2 view modern Flash documents? The technical details are a bit boring, but the simple answer is "yes, but most likely not in any meaningful way". -- Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...> Research Engineer, Expway 7FC0 6F5F D864 EFB8 08CE 8E74 58E6 D5DB 4889 2488
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








