[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Alternatives to DOM for writing XML

• To: Wayne Henshaw <whenshaw@p...>
• Subject: Re: Alternatives to DOM for writing XML
• From: ht@c... (Henry S. Thompson)
• Date: 09 Nov 2002 11:11:05 +0000
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <003c01c2877b$81f80f00$117210ac@b...>
• References: <003c01c2877b$81f80f00$117210ac@b...>
• Sender: ht@i...
• User-agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Military Intelligence)

Wayne Henshaw <whenshaw@p...> writes:

> Hi all,
>   We are trying to solve the problem of writing large XML documents (so
> large that we can't use our DOM parser because of memory constraints)
> and are wondering how other people have handled the problem. I know that
> although "SAXWriter" isn't formally a part of the the SAX API there are
> some libraries that include one, but the parser we use does not. Adding
> to the challenge is the fact that our application is C/C++, so we can't
> easily use Java support. Any suggestions? Thanks.

Have a look at LT XML [1] -- it's a C API for streaming in _and_ out
which was explicitly designed to work with arbitrarily large files.

ht

[1] http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/software/xml/
-- 
  Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
          W3C Fellow 1999--2002, part-time member of W3C Team
     2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
	    Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@c...
		     URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
 [mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]

• References:
  • Alternatives to DOM for writing XML
    • From: Wayne Henshaw <whenshaw@p...>

• Prev by Date: Re: the right place for basic XML questions?
• Next by Date: Re: XML/RDF
• Previous by thread: Re: Alternatives to DOM for writing XML
• Next by thread: Re: Alternatives to DOM for writing XML
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread