[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: more QName madness

• To: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Subject: RE: more QName madness
• From: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>
• Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 22:44:38 -0500 (EST)
• Cc: "xml-dev@l..." <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <r01050400-1021-88308D03F83D11D681070003937A08C2@[192.168.124.21]>

> Could you explain this piece a bit more?  I'm not sure what you
> were suggesting:
> >    Element names don't matter but it can have multiple xmlns:type
> >    attributes that have URI(s) describing the element?

I'm probably hopelessly confused, but I thought this is what some
folks were suggesting instead of qnames, and that this thing was
called architectural forms.  This kind of thing:

        <p xml:type="http://www.org/http/1.0">an html paragraph</p>

        <signature
          xml:type="http://www.org/dsig/1.0"
          xml:type="urn:oasis.org:wss:ws-security:signature">
            ....something which is both a W3C XML DSIG and
            an OASIS WS-Security signature ...
        </signature>

did i get it right?
        /r$

• References:
  • RE: more QName madness
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: RE: more QName madness
• Next by Date: Re: Malicious XML
• Previous by thread: RE: more QName madness
• Next by thread: RE: more QName madness
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread