[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Article: "The horror of XML"

Re:  Article: "The horror of XML"
Elliotte Rusty Harold wrote:

> On no. Not another one. You mean you can send something to a SOAP 
> service that is not an XML document, provided the service knows how to 
> turn it into an infoset?  

I thought this was common knowledge. If it's not, that would explain 
why they're wasn't much outrage about it here (or did I miss it?)

> Yuck. I'm sure that loophole will do wonders 
> for interoperability. 

To my knowledge it's not a loophole. Sending and receiving infosets 
was designed into SOAP 1.2 explicitly. XML 1.0 As We Know It is 
somewhat incidental to SOAP.

Every day in every way I'm learning to despise the
> Infoset just a little bit more.

It's not the Infoset's fault that people specify it.

Bill de hÓra



Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
First Name
Last Name
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3

Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats, enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.

Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website. they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please click here.

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.