RE: Article: "The horror of XML". :)
In the article he says (when talking about programmers that are cheating for performance improvements): <quote> Some of the techniques are relatively harmless, such as stuffing lots of attributes into elements (for example, <shirt color="red"/> instead of <shirt><color>red</ color></shirt>). This is legal and saves the parser from having to handle several tags </quote> But this is not true, in fact it has been proven that choosing attributes or choosing more nested elements has no impact on performance whatsoever. <quote> Even scarier is the emerging practice of rewriting parsers not to require valid XML, such as not requiring end tags. Scary! </quote> Never seen those ... doubt I ever will. It breaks the complete concept of XML. On the same thing he continues: <quote> we'll be stuck with the same miserable situation, where you don't know which browser can properly render which pages. </quote> No, we won't ... since every NORMAL parser will return a good old Fatal ... therefore eliminating the possibility for this EVER to be Web related. <quote> On the other hand, if you're compromising the interoperability of XML, you're effectively using a proprietary format, so you've got one less very big reason to use XML to begin with. Why not use CORBA or COM or some other binary interface that's far more efficient to begin with? </quote> What was it you said about 'agreeing on open standards' early in the article ?? <quote> It uses lots of bandwidth, lots of storage, and lots of processing power. </quote> Yes ... but was it designed for a 2400 baud Internet ?? Have you taken a look at how storage and processing power are growing these days ? And the prices barely hold a candle by what they were. <quote> So before the horror of XML anarchy and balkanization strikes, save yourselves! XML cheating is a trap from which you will never escape! Bwahahahahahhah! </quote> O boy, what a strikingly professional conclusion ... Gerben. -----Original Message----- From: AndrewWatt2000@a... [mailto:AndrewWatt2000@a...] Sent: 30 October 2002 15:27 To: xml-dev@l... Subject: Article: "The horror of XML". :) http://techupdate.zdnet.com/techupdate/stories/main/0,14179,2896005,00.html It's almost as if this guy was eavesdropping on our recent discussions. But, what I want to know, is "Which of you guys are writing these alleged XML parsers which don't require end tags?". :) Shame on you! :) Andrew Watt ----------------------------------------------------------------- The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org> The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format