Re: Not quite an I-D announcement
elharo@m... (Elliotte Rusty Harold) writes: >Section 7 states "The current draft includes providing support for >the default namespace in the XPointer namespace binding context. This >can be removed, but needs consideration." > >It's not clear what you mean here. Section 7 is the only place I see >the default namespace mentioned or used. Basically it means that I needed to think it through. Other sections state that all of the bindings are added, which to me would include the default namespace, but XPath, as you note, ignores it. >Furthermore, the default namespace does not apply to XPath 1.0 >expressions; e.g. //name selects name elements in no namespace, not >name elements in the default namespace. So even if you can include >the default namespace, it probably won't have any effect. I think that's the simple conclusion that I should add instead of my current "needs consideration" text. ------------- Simon St.Laurent - SSL is my TLA http://simonstl.com may be my URI http://monasticxml.org may be my ascetic URI urn:oid:184.108.40.206.4.1.6320 is another possibility altogether
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format