[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Using RDDL as a Distributed Registry Architecture

• To: "'Paul Prescod'" <paul@p...>, <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: Using RDDL as a Distributed Registry Architecture
• From: Bill de hÓra <bill.dehora@p...>
• Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2002 13:07:21 +0100
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <3DA2BFB1.9070401@p...>
• Organization: Propylon
• Reply-to: <bill.dehora@p...>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Prescod [mailto:paul@p...] 
>
> Google's death would be an annoyance but it wouldn't bring anything 
> crashing to a halt the way that the death of DNS would. 

True. The point was that Google centralizes, not that it's key
infrastructure. That's not to say we couldn't come to be critically
dependent on Google or something like it.

Bill de hÓra 
--
Propylon
www.propylon.com 

 





 

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Using RDDL as a Distributed Registry Architecture
    • From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>

• References:
  • Re: Using RDDL as a Distributed Registry Architecture
    • From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>

• Prev by Date: Re: <!-- -- -->
• Next by Date: Re: Using RDDL as a Distributed Registry Architecture
• Previous by thread: Re: Using RDDL as a Distributed Registry Architecture
• Next by thread: Re: Using RDDL as a Distributed Registry Architecture
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread