|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Using RDDL as a Distributed Registry Architecture
That's anthropomorphic reasoning. You're a better scientist than to indulge in the metaphysics of the Grateful Dead. The web doesn't care. The web doesn't know. The web is just a buncha servers tied together by a retrograde GUI over a reworked Gopher protocol. A centralized registry *will* work if it can take the hits and the users accept its authority. Your customer knows this. They may in fact, be lusting after exactly that. You have to convince him/her: 1. Decentralization is more reliable. Share loads among servers or fall over. How much centralization can one afford? Big iron is the quick solution but it doesn't always scale well. 2. Control reminiscent of the politboro has proven remarkably hard to maintain given its reliance on buy in by all participants to centralized authority. Distributing authority is the key to effective local control of local resources. Centralizing design is different from centralizing implementation. If you came to our shop telling an anthropomorphic story, our marketing guys would give you their Stalinesque smile and our development managers would give you their Trotskyesque boot. Your a** would be ours after that. ;-) len From: Roger L. Costello [mailto:costello@m...] 7. Just like the body will reject infectious viruses, so too the Web will reject a centralized, heavyweight registry. Well, that's my thinking. Any comments? /Roger
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








