[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: heritage (was Re: SGML on the Web)

• To: pdurusau@e...
• Subject: Re: heritage (was Re: SGML on the Web)
• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2002 13:44:46 -0400 (EDT)
• Cc: jcowan@r... (John Cowan), elharo@m... (Elliotte Rusty Harold), wperry@f... (W. E. Perry), xml-dev@l... (XML DEV)
• In-reply-to: <3DA070F7.2030302@e...> from "Patrick Durusau" at Oct 06, 2002 01:20:55 PM

Patrick Durusau scripsit:

> No, it is not lack of imagination but the static tree of SGML/XML that 
> is causing the "blind spot." ;-)

I'm not as blind as you think.  :-)

> It is not merely shifting the root from one node to another but 
> "recognizing" only an asserted tree that brings the benefits.

Very true.  But I doubt that what ERH is talking about, which is simple
tree rebalancing, will normally serve this purpose.

-- 
Deshil Holles eamus.  Deshil Holles eamus.  Deshil Holles eamus.
Send us, bright one, light one, Horhorn, quickening, and wombfruit. (3x)
Hoopsa, boyaboy, hoopsa!  Hoopsa, boyaboy, hoopsa!  Hoopsa, boyaboy, hoopsa!
  -- Joyce, _Ulysses_, "Oxen of the Sun"       jcowan@r...

• References:
  • Re: heritage (was Re: SGML on the Web)
    • From: Patrick Durusau <pdurusau@e...>

• Prev by Date: Re: heritage (was Re: SGML on the Web)
• Next by Date: Re: Annotations in XPath-NG? (Re: XPath/XSLT 2.0concerns)
• Previous by thread: Re: heritage (was Re: SGML on the Web)
• Next by thread: Re: heritage (was Re: SGML on the Web)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread