[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Type-based design patterns

• To: jeni@j...
• Subject: Re: Type-based design patterns
• From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>
• Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 11:35:42 +0100
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <32588116827.20021003112808@j...> (message from JeniTennison on Thu, 3 Oct 2002 11:28:08 +0100)
• References: <001101c26a44$1be0e880$6401a8c0@pcukmka><19534340120.20021002203152@j...> <873croy3lk.fsf_-_@n...> <32588116827.20021003112808@j...>

> But I left reality some paragraphs back...
why?
People have been asking for Xpath2 to be uncoupled from w3c schema
types since the first drafts came out. Why do you have to enter another
reality in order to hope that the WGs might finally take notice?

David

_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further
information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call
Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.

• References:
  • RE: XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns
    • From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@n...>
  • Re: XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns
    • From: Jeni Tennison <jeni@j...>
  • Type-based design patterns
    • From: Norman Walsh <ndw@n...>
  • Re: Type-based design patterns
    • From: Jeni Tennison <jeni@j...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Type-based design patterns
• Next by Date: Re: "Datatypes" for DTDs
• Previous by thread: Re: Type-based design patterns
• Next by thread: Re: Type-based design patterns
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread