[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns

• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: RE: XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2002 12:56:58 -0400
• In-reply-to: <8BD7226E07DDFF49AF5EF4030ACE0B7E07A972DF@r...>

Dare writes:
> However, the alternative is for Microsoft to go its own way which I'm
> sure most people would actually consider much worse than the status
> quo. I tend to agree. Being stuck between a rock and a hard place is
> never fun. 

Being told repeatedly to lay off the W3C because we're stuck between
Microsoft (|Oracle|IBM|Sun) and the W3C is definitely not fun.

It's important to remind people that they do in fact have more choices,
though encouraging people to think for themselves when it often requires
more work can certainly be difficult.


-------------
Simon St.Laurent - SSL is my TLA
http://simonstl.com may be my URI
http://monasticxml.org may be my ascetic URI
urn:oid:1.3.6.1.4.1.6320 is another possibility altogether

• References:
  • RE: XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns
    • From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>

• Prev by Date: RE: XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns
• Next by Date: Re: Are hyperlinks presentation or content?
• Previous by thread: RE: XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns
• Next by thread: RE: XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread