[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns

• To: simonstl@s... (Simon St.Laurent)
• Subject: Re: XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns
• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2002 12:15:36 -0400 (EDT)
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <r01050300-1015-9CAC4260D55511D6BFD20003937A08C2@[192.168.124.21]> from "Simon St.Laurent" at Oct 01, 2002 11:51:12 AM

Simon St.Laurent scripsit:

> Did that get killed because it went off the rails, or because of lack of
> interest?  Lots of W3C projects seem to wither for lack of interest. 

AFAIU, it turned out not to satisfy anybody, as a result of attempting to
straddle DTD, WXS, and possible future schemas, plus the conceptual confusion of
whether it was a LCD view of a schema or an abstract method for reading
and manipulating a schema.

-- 
John Cowan  jcowan@r...  www.ccil.org/~cowan  www.reutershealth.com
"If he has seen farther than others,
        it is because he is standing on a stack of dwarves."
                --Mike Champion, describing Tim Berners-Lee (adapted)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns
    • From: "Lauren Wood" <lauren@t...>

• References:
  • Re: XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns
• Next by Date: Re: limits of the generic
• Previous by thread: Re: XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns
• Next by thread: Re: XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread