[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: We need SAX features to say a parser supports XML

• To: robin.berjon@e...
• Subject: Re: We need SAX features to say a parser supports XML
• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 11:04:59 -0400 (EDT)
• Cc: elharo@m... (Elliotte Rusty Harold), xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <3DB95B34.5060009@e...> from "Robin Berjon" at Oct 25, 2002 04:54:44 PM

Robin Berjon scripsit:

> John: is a 1.0e3 planned for to incorporate errata?

No.  Errata are errata; up-to-date parsers should implement them.
Bug-for-bug compatibility is not desirable.

-- 
John Cowan  jcowan@r...  www.ccil.org/~cowan  www.reutershealth.com
"The competent programmer is fully aware of the strictly limited size of his own
skull; therefore he approaches the programming task in full humility, and among
other things he avoids clever tricks like the plague."  --Edsger Dijkstra

• References:
  • Re: We need SAX features to say a parser supports XML
    • From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...>

• Prev by Date: RE: We need SAX features to say a parser supports XML
• Next by Date: Design of streamform declaration.
• Previous by thread: Re: We need SAX features to say a parser supports XML
• Next by thread: RE: We need SAX features to say a parser supports XML 1.1
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread