[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Perceived C/B for XML 1.1

• To: vdv@d... (Eric van der Vlist)
• Subject: Re: Perceived C/B for XML 1.1
• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 06:13:58 -0400 (EDT)
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <1035183691.17193.1602.camel@ibook> from "Eric van der Vlist" at Oct 21, 2002 09:01:29 AM

Eric van der Vlist scripsit:

> 3) Receiver applications read documents from the outside world. They
> would probably the main drivers to migrate to XML 1.1: if significant
> information sources send information as XML 1.1, I would have implement
> at least a gateway to accept these documents. OTH, if the external
> providers which send me these documents have the same policy than I
> would have for my sender applications, is it likely to happen?

Not unless those sources come to include those who have need for it.

Be liberal in what you accept, conservative in what you send.

-- 
If you have ever wondered if you are in hell,         John Cowan
it has been said, then you are on a well-traveled     http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
road of spiritual inquiry.  If you are absolutely   http://www.reutershealth.com
sure you are in hell, however, then you must be         jcowan@r...
on the Cross Bronx Expressway.          --Alan Feur, NYTimes, 2002-09-20

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Perceived C/B for XML 1.1
    • From: Berend de Boer <berend@x...>
  • Re: Perceived C/B for XML 1.1
    • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>

• References:
  • Perceived C/B for XML 1.1
    • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Java package for XPath 1.0
• Next by Date: Re: Perceived C/B for XML 1.1
• Previous by thread: RE: Perceived C/B for XML 1.1
• Next by thread: Re: Perceived C/B for XML 1.1
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread