Re: Re: Divorcing Data Model and Syntax: was Re: her
Patrick Durusau scripsit: > As an alternative, for a "lite" searching interface to a dictionary, you > only want: <entry><headWord>JITTs</headWord>(blob of unparsed PCDATA, > which includes all the markup you got as nodes in the DOM tree in the > first one)</entry> Your postings and your paper seem to disagree about this "blob of unparsed PCDATA". In the paper, you say that markup that's not wanted in the current processing model is ignored, rather than being converted to PCDATA. Also, presumably entity and character references, DOCTYPE declarations, and CDATA sections are recognized in all models? -- John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan <jcowan@r...> You tollerday donsk? N. You tolkatiff scowegian? Nn. You spigotty anglease? Nnn. You phonio saxo? Nnnn. Clear all so! `Tis a Jute.... (Finnegans Wake 16.5)
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format