RE: Just Can't Get No REST
I can control what I write and publish from Fox and FP (although I won't use FP even with a gun to my head). I can't control a centralized library of references who's owners claim they won't change the outcomes of their technologies (no human intervention) but recent events prove they will. Type in "go to hell" in the search engine and see where it points now. The point is simple: sources have to be vetted. A lot of the language in the contracts that have logie requirements are based on the use of provable and testable procedures to do that plus the procedures for how to report discovered errors. Eg, if it can be gamed, a means to detect it and report is must be guaranteed and if it cannot be guaranteed, the reliability numbers for that source are lowered accordingly. Purchase by reliability numbers. Google and XML alone are not up to the requirements of web services. It's misleading to publish articles claiming they are. Someone has to work harder to make web services or REST be up to that task; therefore, Just Can't Get No Rest. len -----Original Message----- From: Paul Prescod [mailto:paul@p...] I don't know what point you're trying to make so I'll just drop out. I'll just say that it is a simple error of fact to claim that it is easier to game Google than to write an RPC that games a UDDI repository. Fire up Visual Foxpro and FrontPage and try it. Paul Prescod
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format