[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns


Re:  XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns
Elliotte Rusty Harold wrote:
> One thing I don't understand about this idea: what if the document is 
> invalid according to its schema? Is schema checking a prerequisite for 
> using the schema (which would seem to be a huge performance hit in 
> itself) or does the processor simply produce incorrect results in this 
> case?

The document needs to be type-decorated, which isn't much different from 
validated in the case of XML Schema, so yes in the normal case you will 
have a performance hit that will most likely be higher than what you 
gain in msot cases.

In the case I am considering however, the document can only be valid 
because it has been binary encoded using a schema, and it won't encode 
if it ain't valid.

-- 
Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...>
Research Engineer, Expway
7FC0 6F5F D864 EFB8 08CE  8E74 58E6 D5DB 4889 2488


PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
 

Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats, enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.


Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website. they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please click here.

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.