Re: Do We Need James Clark to get Good Recs?
Thomas B. Passin wrote: > Sometimes it seems to me that most of the XML-related Recs/Specs that > xml-dev'ers approve of are those that James Clark had a major influence on. > Sax is an exception, I suppose, but that had David M. playing a unifying > role, so maybe it is in a similar category. James Clark was involved with XML before it was a key technology for every big company in the world. The politics were secondary to the technology back then. Someone _like_ James Clark is a necessary but not sufficient condition to producing a great spec. The other half is that he and his co-workers need to be freed to work without constant pressure to add features before V1 ships. Paul Prescod
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format