[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Re: Divorcing Data Model and Syntax: was Re: h

• To: 'Jeni Tennison' <jeni@j...>, Patrick Durusau <pdurusau@e...>
• Subject: RE: Re: Divorcing Data Model and Syntax: was Re: heritage (was Re: SGML on the Web)
• From: Jeff Lowery <jlowery@s...>
• Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2002 13:00:23 -0700
• Cc: XML DEV <xml-dev@l...>

The LMNL's overlapping hierarchies for some crazy reason bring to mind how
complex waveforms are constructed from overlapping simple sinusoidal waves.

Is LMNL a superimposition of trees?   Is it possible to represent trees in a
way that allows them to be superimposed into an LMNL? 

1. <a>    </a>
2.        <b           z="...">             </b>
3.                                        <c/>
 |
\/

4.  <a><b></a> z="...><c/></b>       {albeit in appropriate LMNL notation,
of course!}
 

A nutty idea, perhaps.  But from little nuts, tiny acorns grow.   Er, no,
wait.... how's that go again?

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Re: Divorcing Data Model and Syntax: was Re: [xml-d ev]heritage (was Re: SGML on the Web)
    • From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>
  • Re: Re: Divorcing Data Model and Syntax: was Re: [xml-d ev] heritage (was Re: SGML on the Web)
    • From: Jeni Tennison <jeni@j...>

• Prev by Date: Re: More namespaces fun!
• Next by Date: Using RDDL as a Distributed Registry Architecture
• Previous by thread: white spaces before prolog . can i work aroung it
• Next by thread: Re: Re: Divorcing Data Model and Syntax: was Re: [xml-d ev] heritage (was Re: SGML on the Web)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread