Re: We need SAX features to say a parser supports XML
From: "Elliotte Rusty Harold" <elharo@m...> > Errata can fix editorial mistakes. > However, errata cannot fix design mistakes. In the ISO world there seems be a distinction made between an erratum (i.e., an error in transmitting what the committee decided) and a corrigendum (i.e., a correction being made when a spec is somehow broken), IIRC. The former is trivial to fix, and the second requires more work. Normally, of course, committees try to use the easiest method and will say "of course, what we *meant* to say was ...". In the W3C world there is nothing in between an erratum and a version up, so errata can be expected to also contain corrections relating to exigencies. This is a procedural issue: you buy into an organization's technology, and you may also have to live with their procedures too. Cheers Rick Jelliffe
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format