[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Profundity du jour (was Re: What is XML For?)

• To: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Subject: Re: Profundity du jour (was Re: What is XML For?)
• From: Jeni Tennison <jeni@j...>
• Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 15:43:47 +0100
• Cc: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>, Mike Champion <mc@x...>, xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <3DB8033D.4040207@t...>
• Organization: Jeni Tennison Consulting Ltd
• References: <200210241309.JAA04568@m...><3DB8033D.4040207@t...>
• Reply-to: Jeni Tennison <jeni@j...>

Tim Bray wrote:
> John Cowan wrote:
>> But not because he was a fool. I didn't use this quote because I
>> think it's off the point: the trouble is that it is hard to think
>> of someone who 1) is uncontroversially a fool of the relevant kind
>> and 2) is well-known.
>
> Pons & Fleischman?

Uncontroversially? I think that the Cold Fusion Times would disagree.
The "for skeptics" page at:

  http://world.std.com/~mica/cfskeptic.html

has many fun quotes relevant to this (hugely off-topic) thread.
  
Cheers,

Jeni

---
Jeni Tennison
http://www.jenitennison.com/

• References:
  • Re: Profundity du jour (was Re: What is XML For?)
    • From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
  • Re: Profundity du jour (was Re: What is XML For?)
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Re: W3C and Linking - what is the future?
• Next by Date: RE: Profundity du jour (was Re: What is XML F or?)
• Previous by thread: Re: Profundity du jour (was Re: What is XML For?)
• Next by thread: Re: Profundity du jour (was Re: What is XML For?)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread