|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Specifying a Unicode subset
tblanchard@m... wrote: >Unicode has arrived to kill off all of the short sighted legacy >character encodings and while unicode has a *lot* of problems for asian >languages (Han unification was *NOT* a good idea), it remains >infinitely better than the tower of Babel we had before. I think you definition of the word 'encoding' is a little too broad. This is not about encodings. It's about giving users the freedom to choose which parts of Unicode they want. How to specify the method to convert character numbers to binary form is another problem, and I'm happy with the solution XML provides. This way, those who need to use characters in the intervals forbidden in XML 1.0 would have the freedom to use them, while the rest of us are left unaffected. If I'd decide, there would be no change in XML. But if a new version is unavoidable and I need to pick one, I'd rather go for a more flexible solution, because I fear that 1.1 won't be the last version of its kind. I admit there may be better ways than using a PI. Maybe the information about legal characters is better to specify at the schema level rather than for each document, but these things are just details. The main point is that specifying which characters are legal in the specification itself may be too limiting. Perhaps the only real requirement should be that the character numbers have the meaning specified in Unicode? Gustaf
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








