[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: JITTs and DOM

• To: <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: JITTs and DOM
• From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
• Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 20:26:57 +1000
• References: <200210101305.JAA29379@m...> <19514849372.20021010140724@j...> <3DA58333.7080001@e...> <19218876953.20021010151432@j...> <003401c2707f$ef703160$4bc8a8c0@A...> <3DA6A310.9090608@e...>

From: "Patrick Durusau" <pdurusau@e...>

> This ties the processing of the markup to the inline syntax in the 
> document instance, a bad thing in my opinion. The JITTs paradigm allows 
> you to impose structure upon the markup in the document instance, as 
> opposed to relying solely upon the inline syntax.
...
> It is a limitation of the JITTs paradigm, which will be noticed by its 
> critics once all other criticisms fail, that it requires use of a DTD or 
> schema. 

So the only way to know if the document is correctly marked up
is to have enough DTDs to cover every tag?

Cheers
Rick Jelliffe

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: JITTs and DOM
    • From: Patrick Durusau <pdurusau@e...>

• References:
  • JITTs and DOM
    • From: Patrick Durusau <pdurusau@e...>
  • Re: JITTs and DOM
    • From: Jeni Tennison <jeni@j...>
  • Re: JITTs and DOM
    • From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
  • Re: JITTs and DOM
    • From: Patrick Durusau <pdurusau@e...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Processing huge XML files
• Next by Date: Re: JITTs and DOM
• Previous by thread: Re: JITTs and DOM
• Next by thread: Re: JITTs and DOM
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread