[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: ANN: xpath1() scheme for XPointer

• To: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>
• Subject: Re: ANN: xpath1() scheme for XPointer
• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 08:28:08 -0700
• Cc: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@a...>, xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <E185s5N-0004pl-00@m...>
• References: <E185s5N-0004pl-00@m...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.2b) Gecko/20021016

Uche Ogbuji wrote:

> >From: "Simon St.Laurent"
>
> >I've never quite cottened on to why XIncludes are useful.  Is it because
> >the longevity of ID/IDREF means that "document scope" has not gone
> >away, yet because entities are not first-class constructs in XML the 
> current
> >generation of tools promotes an all-element solution (and bugger the
> >structure)?
>
>
> To me, the following are the most useful things about XIncludes which are
> lacking in EPEs:

I also thought XInclude sounded plausible and useful when they first 
started talking about it, but I have to say it has been almost 
completely ignored.  -Tim

• References:
  • Re: ANN: xpath1() scheme for XPointer
    • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>

• Prev by Date: RE: [ANN] "Future of Software and Databases" NetSeminar(December 3)
• Next by Date: [ANN] XMLNewbies Mailing List
• Previous by thread: Re: ANN: xpath1() scheme for XPointer
• Next by thread: RE: ANN: xpath1() scheme for XPointer
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread