[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

R: Comparison between SAX parser

• To: "Karl Waclawek" <karl@w...>, <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: R: Comparison between SAX parser
• From: "Enrico Prosperi" <enrico.prosperi@a...>
• Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 11:28:45 +0200
• Thread-index: AcJ55SgDONHcG1XNQFOIUfjkrwuBnAAkFqHA
• Thread-topic: Comparison between SAX parser

I need both:Speed and validation!But I need also documentation and reliability... maybe I'm asking the moon :-), but someone can help me to arrive closer (to the moon)!
Thank you and best

-----Messaggio originale-----
Da: Karl Waclawek [mailto:karl@w...]
Inviato: martedì 22 ottobre 2002 17.05
A: Enrico Prosperi; xml-dev@l...
Oggetto: Re:  Comparison between SAX parser


What are your needs? Speed? Validation?
For speed SAXinC++ (based on Expat) is likely one of the best choices,
but it does not validate.

Karl

----- Original Message -----
From: "Enrico Prosperi" <enrico.prosperi@a...>
To: <xml-dev@l...>
Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 11:49 AM
Subject:  Comparison between SAX parser


Dear Sirs,
I need to develop a C++ application that will use a SAX parser. I have seen that there are a lot of
implementation of SAX Parser (SAXinC++, Xerces. MicrosoftSAX, Oracle, etc...). Is there anyone that
can help me to decide what is the best (loking at performance, documentation, stability etc...).
I'll develop for win32. Any suggest will be very appreciate! If anyone knows other implementations
that I didn't mention, please tell me!

Thank you in advance and
Best Regards

Enrico Prosperi

-----------------------------------------------------------------
The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>

The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/

To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>

• Prev by Date: Re: XML as "passive data" (Re: The Browser Wa rs are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wars!)
• Next by Date: Re: XML as "passive data" (Re: The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wars!)
• Previous by thread: XML 1.1 documents
• Next by thread: RE: R: Comparison between SAX parser
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread