Re: Perceived C/B for XML 1.1
Please calm down, Simon. I believe this is a simple misunderstanding. "Business", as in "Business Rules" and "Business Partners", does not refer to commerce any more than the phrase "MYOB" does. Please see the first definition at http://www.dict.org/bin/Dict?Query=business -Wayne Steele >From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...> >To: xml-dev@l... >Subject: Re: Perceived C/B for XML 1.1 >Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 11:03:08 -0400 > >jcowan@r... (John Cowan) writes: > >> Business partners, right. I don't object strongly to XML 1.1, but I > >> do object to notions of communication that are just about business > >> partners. > > > >I don't object to a relaxed definition in which you and I count as > >"business partners", since we have an interest in communicating. > >That's offensive, not relaxed. It's almost as silly as the "all >computerized communications must be done through formal contracts" >nonsense we used to hear around XML a few years ago. > >Conflating communication into business is just obnoxious. Perhaps the >complaints about NEL's priority weren't that far off... > > >------------- >Simon St.Laurent - SSL is my TLA >http://simonstl.com may be my URI >http://monasticxml.org may be my ascetic URI >urn:oid:18.104.22.168.4.1.6320 is another possibility altogether > _________________________________________________________________ Get a speedy connection with MSN Broadband. Join now! http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/freeactivation.asp
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format