Re: XML, routing
miles@m... (Miles Sabin) writes: >But I don't think it has any bearing on the viability of pushing XML >down the stack in the way Kurt's report seemed to be suggesting >(whether or not that was what Don _meant_ to say). There's too much >exisiting infrastructure for that to be viable outside of relatively >closed environments. > >Like I said: look at IPv6, or look at multicast. For the public Internet, I completely agree. I'm more concerned about the impact of these issues on "relatively closed environments." For a brief period of time, we've had a strangely unified networking universe, where large chunks of the closed environments are running on the same network infrastructure as the open environments. It's not universal, of course - there are still lots of non-IP environments out there - but it's certainly been a change. If, as I suspect, this kind of routing starts out on top of an HTTP (or even) IP foundation which can later be shifted to whatever seems convenient, we may find that situation changing. I have to admit that I marveled at how transparent the switchover from NetBEUI/whatever to TCP/IP felt over successive versions of Windows. Might be better for some people, might be worse for others. (Personally, I've never been too happy with how closed-environment assumptions have afflicted a lot of seemingly open-environment specifications, including XML, so I'd be inclined to say it was for the worse.) ------------- Simon St.Laurent - SSL is my TLA http://simonstl.com may be my URI http://monasticxml.org may be my ascetic URI urn:oid:18.104.22.168.4.1.6320 is another possibility altogether
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format