[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: heritage (was Re: SGML on the Web)

• To: <pdurusau@e...>,"Jeni Tennison" <jeni@j...>
• Subject: RE: heritage (was Re: SGML on the Web)
• From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2002 08:04:37 -0700
• Cc: "W. E. Perry" <wperry@f...>,"XML DEV" <xml-dev@l...>
• Thread-index: AcJuENeMq9uO2/ZoSZSeEcf6p/TT+AAAdLqU
• Thread-topic: heritage (was Re: SGML on the Web)

Can anyone on the XML Core WG state whether the document at the URL described below has any degree of normativeness whatsoever? This is really a question for John Cowan or Tim Bray. 

	-----Original Message----- 
	From: Patrick Durusau [mailto:pdurusau@e...] 
	Sent: Mon 10/7/2002 7:31 AM 
	To: Jeni Tennison 
	Cc: W. E. Perry; XML DEV 
	Subject: Re:  heritage (was Re:  SGML on the Web)
	
	

	
	Underlying XML is a data model. That data model is set forth at:
	http://www.w3.org/XML/Datamodel.html
	
	It is not happenstance that all of the "data models" that you cite,
	PSVI, XPath, DOM, are based on the presumption of a tree. The tree model
	underlies all those "data models" and its presence was not a matter of
	chance (or choice). (LMNL does not use that model but then it is not a
	XML data model. It is a data model that can model documents based on the
	XML data model.)
	
	

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: heritage (was Re: SGML on the Web)
    • From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>

• Prev by Date: Re: heritage (was Re: SGML on the Web)
• Next by Date: Re: heritage (was Re: SGML on the Web)
• Previous by thread: Re: Essentials (was RE: heritage (was Re: SGML on the
• Next by thread: Re: heritage (was Re: SGML on the Web)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread