[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns

• To: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>,"Mike Champion" <mc@x...>,<xml-dev@l...>,"Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Subject: RE: XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns
• From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2002 09:33:18 -0700
• Thread-index: AcJqL0UxQ5cn94crR9Kw3sHTHsGFhQAAUh1g
• Thread-topic: XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bullard, Claude L (Len) [mailto:clbullar@i...] 
> Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 9:17 AM
> To: Dare Obasanjo; Mike Champion; xml-dev@l...; 
> Simon St.Laurent
> 
> Any idea when or if the VFP team will catch up to the 
> corporate plan?  It would save lots of us a lot of monkey 
> work.  I realize VFP is not a front runner product, but MS 
> has yet to field a VS/VB solution that is nearly as powerful 
> when it comes to build relational clients.  VizFox is a very 
> powerful language for that.

No idea. Don't know anyone on the Fox Pro team but can look into if
you're seriously interested. However retooling to support something as
large and complex as XSD is not an overnight affair. For instance, even
Biztalk Server has received a lot of flak for limited XSD support over
XDR[0] 

[0] http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,3959,16323,00.asp 

-- 
PITHY WORDS OF WISDOM 
The meek shall inherit the Earth....if that's all right with the rest of
you.          

This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights. 

• Prev by Date: Re: XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns
• Next by Date: RE: XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns
• Previous by thread: RE: XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns
• Next by thread: RE: XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread