Cart
|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: limits of the generic
> Hi Jeni,
>
> On Tue, 2002-10-01 at 00:52, Jeni Tennison wrote:
>
> > >> <dt:datatype name="my:UKDate">
> > >> <!-- a date in the format DD/MM/YYYY -->
> > >>
> > >> <dt:components>
> > >> <dt:component name="day" select="substring(., 1, 2)" />
> > >> <dt:component name="month" select="substring(., 4, 2)" />
> > >> <dt:component name="year" select="substring(., 7, 4)" />
> > >> </dt:components>
>
> If you allow the plug, this looks rather parallel to what I am proposing
> with xvif (see for instance in my strawman [1] the test cases spilting
> dates as a list of tokens [2] or elements [3] which you can also try
> online).
This is true. I guess if you put it in that light, I can consider it with a
more friendly eye. I know that XVIF has been designed from the beginning to
support generic lexical processing. I guess that's been what Jeni has been
trying to do as well, but it looked as if her example was couched in the sense
of defining a set of operations and lexical mappings tailored to WXS types.
Perhaps I was too hasty in that judgment.
So, starting afresh on this idea, and expressing it in XVIF, which has the
advantage of a handy implementation right now, the basic lexical
interpretation of dates would look like (partly stolen from Eric's doc):
<dt:components xmlns="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"
xmlns:if="http://namespaces.xmlschemata.org/xvif/iframe"
datatypeLibrary="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-datatypes">
<dt:lexical-preprocess>
<if:transform type="http://simonstl.com/ns/fragments/">
<if:apply>
<fragmentRules xmlns="http://simonstl.com/ns/fragments/">
<fragmentRule pattern="^[ \t\n]*([0-9]{4})-([0-9]{2})-([0-9]{2})[
\t\n]*$">
<applyTo>
<element localName="date"/>
</applyTo>
<produce>
<element localName="year"/>
<element localName="month"/>
<element localName="day"/>
</produce>
</fragmentRule>
</fragmentRules>
</if:apply>
</if:transform>
</dt:lexical-preprocess>
</dt:components>
So this uses regular fragmentations to turn
<spam>2002-10-01</spam>
into
<spam>
<year>2002</year>
<month>10</year</month>
<day>01</day>
</spam>
Yes, we could use some XPath mechanism to do this as well, as Eric's straw man
also demonstrates, but I wanted to use the mechanism that appeals to me best.
People can also put whatever they want into the dt:lexical-proprocess element
including a pipe that defines some other transforms and perhaps a validation
step.
So now we have the lexical representation mapped to a set of sub-elements that
can be very readily manipulated by XPath for value-space declarations.
What we'd need to add is some mechanism for such declarations, mapping them to
operators. Maybe:
<dt:components xmlns="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"
xmlns:if="http://namespaces.xmlschemata.org/xvif/iframe"
dtl="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-datatypes">
<dt:lexical-preprocess>
<if:transform type="http://simonstl.com/ns/fragments/">
<if:apply>
<fragmentRules xmlns="http://simonstl.com/ns/fragments/">
<fragmentRule pattern="^[ \t\n]*([0-9]{4})-([0-9]{2})-([0-9]{2})[
\t\n]*$">
<applyTo>
<element localName="date"/>
</applyTo>
<produce>
<element localName="year"/>
<element localName="month"/>
<element localName="day"/>
</produce>
</fragmentRule>
</fragmentRules>
</if:apply>
</if:transform>
</dt:lexical-preprocess>
<dt:operator symbol="=">
<dt:result>
<if:transform type="http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath"
apply="$lhs/year = $rhs/year and $lhs/month = $rhs/month and $lhs/day =
$rhs/day"/>
</dt:result>
</dt:operator>
<!-- silly function example -->
<dt:function name="dtl:date-in-us-format">
<dt:result>
<if:transform type="http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath"
apply="concat(month,'/',day,'/',year)"/>
</dt:result>
</dt:function>
</dt:components>
Very intriguing idea, I guess, after all. Naturally, optimized
implementations would not have to use all the above binding info and can just
jump straight to the optimized code, similar to functions that implement EXSLT
extensions natively and do not then have to run the exsl:function version,
though they can always fall back to that for classes they do not support.
This does only answer one of my complaint: generic dispatch and constraint
processing. That is a big bone of contention, so I'd be happy for such a
solution, but the fact is that it still introduces a lot of complexity, which
is worrisome.
However, if it is inevitable that the data types juggernaut must have its
stone of flesh in the end, I would rather a mechanism such as the above
allowed others to put their own data types on an even keel, and also allowed
other forms of axiomatic processing besides data types. I also like that it
expresses value space operations as simple transforms on the plain lexical
information, which is an important assertion of layering.
> I am currently trying to define the basic building blocks of xvif, but
> at a later stage, dt:compents(s) could be good candidates as shortcuts.
>
> Xvif doesn't support a test like you've shown, but I am wondering if it
> shouldn't support variables in such case this kind of test should be
> possible to express...
XVIF would need some additional facilities to support this, including variable
bindings. But none of them look like more work than what's already there.
> And of course, as already mentioned, there is no reasons why xvif
> couldn't be used either standalone or in other host languages than Relax
> NG in which case XSLT would be the number one candidate!
Indeed. As I mentioned to you the other day, I think all XVIF needs is a
binding for results of the if:pipe in terms of all the XPath data types, not
just boolean as currently defined. Therefore validates would tend to map to
boolean, transforms to node sets or strings, etc. Again shouldn't bee too
terribly hard compared to what has gone before.
--
Uche Ogbuji Fourthought, Inc.
http://uche.ogbuji.net http://4Suite.org http://fourthought.com
Apache 2.0 API - http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/linux/library/l-apache/
Python&XML column: Tour of Python/XML - http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2002/09/18/py.html
Python/Web Services column: xmlrpclib - http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/webservices/library/ws-pyth10.html
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! 
Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||
