|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: W3C and Linking - what is the future?
AndrewWatt2000@a... scripsit: > So what does that mean for the future development of linking technologies at > W3C? It means that XLink is defined and XPointer is going to be defined and that's it, unless the W3C membership decide there's a need, in which case a new WG will be chartered or an existing WG will have its charter extended. > Is HLink now the future? It would be ironic if that proves to be the case, > after TAG's pronouncement of a few short weeks ago. Is anyone to believe that > XLink 1.0 is the definitive linking technology, incapable of improvement? No. You are to believe that the members of the Linking WG are sick of it. They've been working on XLink and XPointer since 1998, after all. (There are one or two John-come-latelies, including me, who aren't quite so burned out.) > Maybe someone will stumble across the plot and hand it in to a Lost Property > Office. Sure. Like IETF, or OASIS, or ECMA, or ISO. -- If you have ever wondered if you are in hell, John Cowan it has been said, then you are on a well-traveled http://www.ccil.org/~cowan road of spiritual inquiry. If you are absolutely http://www.reutershealth.com sure you are in hell, however, then you must be jcowan@r... on the Cross Bronx Expressway. --Alan Feur, NYTimes, 2002-09-20
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








